🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.